togel 4d situs togel kaskustoto kaskustoto slot88 Kaskustoto agen toto togel 4d situs togel resmi toto link alternatif kaskustoto bandar togel 4d tototogel bandar togel 4d situs togel slot bandar slot pulsa bandar togel macau situs toto togel 4d toto togel resmi situstoto situs togel terpercaya situs toto 4d resmi situs togel toto 4d bo slot terpercaya slot88 situs toto togel resmi Link Bandar kaskustoto Terpercaya kaskustoto situstoto togel4d togel4d situs togel situs togel terpercaya situs toto toto togel
How To Evaluate Doctoral Dissertations: Roadmap – IATELS – International Association for Technology, Education and Language Studies

How To Evaluate Doctoral Dissertations: Roadmap

Dear Colleagues,

To your attention we would like to provide you with the guidelines for evaluating doctoral dissertations.

As there are numerous discussions on evaluating research papers the main points have been collected to put them in a concise form. The layout can be used as a hand manual for the reviewers and PhD students’ self-evaluation.

In the table below we highlight the main components of the dissertation. Each component must contain specific information and expose certain characteristics to be evaluated as sufficient for the doctoral level.

The main criteria for evaluating doctoral dissertations are as follows:

1. Scientific significance of the research results and 2. Contribution of the candidate to the research. Additionally the following specific criteria are applied:

• Starting point of the research:

◦ scientific level, formulation and motivation of the research problem;

◦ theoretical basis of the research and connection to the previous research;

◦ scientific, societal and practical relevance of the research;

• Research process:

◦ command of the research field, knowledge and use of the literature;

◦ command, definition and clarity of the concepts;

◦ success of the choices and solutions during the research process and possibility to evaluate them;

◦ command and suitability of the methods;

◦ quality and carefulness of the research;

Research results:

◦ new knowledge and the results gained in the research work;

◦ sufficiency of the research contribution of the candidate;

◦ consistent foundation of the results on the data;

◦ significance of the research results in the own research field;

◦ coherence, stylistic and linguistic form of the presentation;

Evaluation criteria concerning only the doctoral dissertations:

◦ in an article-based dissertation: quality of the publications

More criteria for evaluating doctoral dissertations are laid out in the table below:

From our research team of IATELS we wish success to all our colleagues in their academic endeavours and great achievements in their careers!

One thought on “How To Evaluate Doctoral Dissertations: Roadmap

  • 6 November 2020 at 07:23

    Thanks a lot for providing individuals with an extremely memorable possiblity to check tips from this blog. It really is so ideal and full of a lot of fun for me and my office peers to search your web site at the very least 3 times in a week to study the new things you will have. Not to mention, we are at all times pleased considering the cool creative ideas served by you. Certain 2 tips in this posting are essentially the most efficient I’ve had.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *